<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scientific fraud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reproducibleresearch.net/blog/2008/10/27/scientific-fraud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reproducibleresearch.net/blog/2008/10/27/scientific-fraud/</link>
	<description>Ideas, interesting papers and news items around reproducible research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:11:59 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Koninckx</title>
		<link>http://www.reproducibleresearch.net/blog/2008/10/27/scientific-fraud/comment-page-1/#comment-600</link>
		<dc:creator>Koninckx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 14:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pixeltje.be/?p=71#comment-600</guid>
		<description>Manipulation of data is much more common than overall believed. Besides pure fraud, manipulation takes many forms, such as adding to abstracts or titles words not supported by the data in order to increase the probability to be picked up during searches. A second problem are the journals (many online) with poor reviewing and withotu the possiblity to send letters to the editor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Manipulation of data is much more common than overall believed. Besides pure fraud, manipulation takes many forms, such as adding to abstracts or titles words not supported by the data in order to increase the probability to be picked up during searches. A second problem are the journals (many online) with poor reviewing and withotu the possiblity to send letters to the editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

