<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Access Week</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.reproducibleresearch.net/blog/2009/10/20/open-access-week/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.reproducibleresearch.net/blog/2009/10/20/open-access-week/</link>
	<description>Ideas, interesting papers and news items around reproducible research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 14:11:59 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Some Random Internet Dude</title>
		<link>http://www.reproducibleresearch.net/blog/2009/10/20/open-access-week/comment-page-1/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Some Random Internet Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reproducibleresearch.net/blog/?p=157#comment-169</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen any of the reproducible research people discussing the foolishness of the East Anglia CRU -- clearly, if they had been using any basic concepts of literate programming they wouldn&#039;t be up the creek.

Such &quot;famous&quot; figures using such archaic methods, with much in the balance.

Just something to think about: when big-picture science and international politics collide, shouldn&#039;t the core science be based around a methodological philosophy of reproducible research?

Wouldn&#039;t it have been great if they could have had several Sweave files ready to go?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen any of the reproducible research people discussing the foolishness of the East Anglia CRU &#8212; clearly, if they had been using any basic concepts of literate programming they wouldn&#8217;t be up the creek.</p>
<p>Such &#8220;famous&#8221; figures using such archaic methods, with much in the balance.</p>
<p>Just something to think about: when big-picture science and international politics collide, shouldn&#8217;t the core science be based around a methodological philosophy of reproducible research?</p>
<p>Wouldn&#8217;t it have been great if they could have had several Sweave files ready to go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: José Luis Pedraza Muciño</title>
		<link>http://www.reproducibleresearch.net/blog/2009/10/20/open-access-week/comment-page-1/#comment-163</link>
		<dc:creator>José Luis Pedraza Muciño</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 16:37:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.reproducibleresearch.net/blog/?p=157#comment-163</guid>
		<description>Under Open Access philosophy, Redalyc aims to contribute to the editorial scientific activity produced in and about Ibero-America making available for public consultation the contents of 550 scientific journals of different knowledge areas: &lt;a href=&quot;http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://redalyc.uaemex.mx&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Under Open Access philosophy, Redalyc aims to contribute to the editorial scientific activity produced in and about Ibero-America making available for public consultation the contents of 550 scientific journals of different knowledge areas: <a href="http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/" rel="nofollow">http://redalyc.uaemex.mx</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

